Legal Opinion

Carella v. Reilly & Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 17, 2005PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the third third-party defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Alpert, J.), dated September 28, 2004, as denied those branches of their motion which were to dismiss the third third-party complaint and to impose sanctions against the third third-party plaintiffs.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof denying that branch of the motion which was to dismiss the third third-party complaint, and substituting therefor a provision…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. MetLife Auto & Home v. Joe Basil Chevrolet, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. City of Oneida v. ChassinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Bergstol v. Town of MonroeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. Carella v. Reilly & AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  5. All Terrain Properties, Inc. v. HoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ortega v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API