Legal Opinion

Matter of Tuomey v. Cohen

New York Court of Appeals

Decided August 17, 1946PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum: Some of the judges are of opinion that the appellant Ambro validly complied with section 335 of the Election Law but that view does not have the support of a majority of the court. Since the Appellate Division’s order of modification was made on the law alone, we lack the power to review the facts (Civ. Prac. Act, § 602). Hence, the order is affirmed, without costs. No opinion.

Concur: Lotjghran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Ftjld, JJ. Taking no part: Thacher and Dye, JJ.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. MATTER OF GOODMAN v. HaydukNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Ambro v. CoveneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
  3. Casey v. LomenzoNew York Supreme Court · 1968
  4. MATTER OF GOODMAN v. HaydukNew York Court of Appeals · 1978