Legal Opinion

Goldstick v. Lambert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 24, 1990PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Application pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, seeking to compel respondent Surrogate to sign a decision and order made by her on the record, on July 18, 1989, in response to petitioner’s request for disclosure as to the nature of the Surrogate’s relationship with opposing counsel, which the Surrogate sua sponte converted into a motion for her disqualification, which motion the court denied, and further ordered that such determination must be appealed from within 30 days, unanimously granted, and the Surrogate directed to sign either the certified minutes or the formal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Legal Aid Society of Sullivan County, Inc. v. ScheinmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Klostermann v. CuomoNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Grisi v. ShainswitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. Kahn v. BackerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Matter of Amara AA. (Ashley AA.)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  2. Estate of Goldberg v. RothAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Matter of Amara AA. (Ashley AA.)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API