Legal Opinion

Kinzy v. Howard and Howard, PLLC

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 3, 2019No. 1:16-cv-08230Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) KYLE KINZY and JACKI KINZY, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) No. 16 C 8230 v. ) ) Judge Virginia M. Kendall HOWARD & HOWARD, PLLC, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER First Tennessee Bank, National Association, foreclosed on its mortgage to Kyle and Jacki Kinzy, which the Kinzys claim they did not sign, making it—at least in their view—unenforceable. The parties litigated this alleged forgery in state court, where Howard & Howard, PLLC, and the other named law firm defendants repre- sented First Tennessee Bank. The Kinzys…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Sykes v. Cook County Circuit Court Probate DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  4. Mains v. Citibank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  5. Dietchweiler Ex Rel. Dietchweiler v. LucasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API