Legal Opinion

Edmonds v. Cooper

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided March 9, 1928No. 3698Published

1Opinion of the Court

Finletter, P. J.,

The prothonotary has declined to issue a pluries writ of capias ad satisfaciendum unless it is accompanied by a writ of fieri facias. This rule is taken upon him to show cause why he should not issue the pluries ca. sa. alone.

The docket entries show that the plaintiff has already caused three such pairs of simultaneous writs to issue, all of which have been returned nulla bona and n. e. i.

*231There is no statute nor any rule of common law forbidding the issuance of the ca. sa,. in the first instance and alone if the defendant has no property.

The Act of April 13, 1807, § 5, 4 Sm.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Winder v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1843

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API