State v. Fritz

WARDEN, J.,

specially concurring.

Defendant’s only assignment of error is the failure of the trial court to impose sanctions for lack of discovery. The majority concludes that that was harmless, if it was error. I agree that it was harmless and, therefore, see no need to address the application of ORS 135.815 or to discuss the meaning of State v. Haynes, 49 Or App 89, 619 P2d 889 (1980), *414or State v. Morrison, 33 Or App 9, 575 P2d 988 (1978). Accordingly, I specially concur.