Legal Opinion

Palmer Transfer Co. v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 2, 1910PublishedCited by 1 opinion

CASE 42. — ACTION BY CHARLIE SMITH BY HIS GUARDIAN AGAINST THE PALMER TRANSFER COMPANY. Appeal from McCracken Circuit Court. ’ W. M. Reed, Circuit Judge. Judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. —

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Wm. Rogers Clay, Commissioner

— Affirming.

The appellant, Palmer Transfer Company, owns and operates a bus line in the city of Paducah. Charlie Smith, while riding' on one of appellant’s busses, was thrown therefrom and his leg broken. Charging that the injury was due to the negligence of appellant, he, by his guardian, instituted this action to recover damages. The jury returned a verdict in his favor for $900. From the judgment based thereon, this appeal is prosecuted.

Appellant asks a reversal of the judgment upon the following grounds: (1) Error of the court in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wilton v. Middlesex RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  2. Little Rock Traction & Electric Co. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899
  3. Brennan v. Fair Haven & Westville RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1877
  4. Buck v. People's Street Railway & Electric Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  5. L. & N. R. R. Co. v. Scott's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bowling Green Railway Co. v. Lewis' AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API