Legal Opinion

Parnell v. Davenport

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1908No. 2,506PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Silver Bow County; Geo. M. Bourquin, Judge. Action by Samuel Parnell against J. R. Davenport and tbe Davenport Company on a duebill. From an order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial, they appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holloway

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court.

In 1905, F. W. Warnocb bad a contract with tbe Original Mining Company to supply certain mining timbers, wbicb be *572procured in Jefferson county and shipped to the company in Butte. In order to prosecute his work, Warnock borrowed money from the appellant, the Davenport Company, and as partial security for such loan assigned to the Davenport Company the moneys due him each month for timber sold to the Original Mining Company. Parnell, the plaintiff and respondent, was, employed by Warnock in cutting and preparing these mining timbers. On December 12, 1905,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Capital Lumber Co. v. BarthMontana Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harrington v. H. D. Lee Mercantile Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Bowlin Liquor Co. v. FauverMontana Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Owens v. DavenportMontana Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API