Johnson v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1DissentChappell, J.
I cannot agree with the majority opinion in this case, for several reasons.
The opinion contains what purports to be a statement of the facts, and if these facts were the only com petent evidence in the record, the reversal might be justified; but the additional facts in the record make out an entirely different case.
It appears from the record that the prosecutrix, who was between 18 and 19 years of age, was deficient mentally. She testified that she was alone in her father’s home; that she went to the defendant’s home to borrow some sugar to make a caite; that when asked about her folks, she…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Pickett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
- Mayse v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
- Choate v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
- Underwood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
- State v. GoodaleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.