Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lee v. Stamper

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided March 29, 1957Published

1DissentSims, Judge

I am not in accord with that part of the majority opinion which holds the amount of special damages does not have to be specifically pleaded and will give my reasons in this dissent.

True, the Rules of Civil Procedure attempt to get away from the strict requirements of the Civil Code, but to my mind this does not mean the Civil Rules have eliminated all requirements of pleading a cause of action, or that a monkey may now prepare a complaint as well as a man.

The majority correctly say the purpose of CR 9.06 is to require the pleading to advise the opposite party that special damages are being…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lexington Ry. Co. v. BrittonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  2. Utterback's Administrator v. QuickCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  3. Fleming v. Dierks Lumber & Coal Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1941
  4. Coleman v. DanielCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API