Legal Opinion
National Bank of North America v. Paskow
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 2, 1981PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Defendant does not deny execution of the guarantee or claim that she ever gave the written notice of termination *955which it required. She argues before us that under the holding in Bankers Trust Hudson Val., N. A. v Christie (68 AD2d 969, on reargument 72 AD2d 614) her guarantee was terminated nonetheless when the overdrafts sought to be collected from her were incurred. We need not express any opinion concerning the holding of that case, however, for the factual predicate for its application is…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bankers Trust Hudson Valley v. ChristieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Bankers Trust Hudson Valley v. ChristieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lorisa Capital Corp. v. GalloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Primary Industries Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- In re the Arbitration between Intelligent Bank Management, Inc. & East Coast Financial Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- NAT'L BANK OF N. AM. v. PaskowNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- H.E.G. Development & Management Corp. v. BlumbergNew York Supreme Court · 1997