Legal Opinion

Bana v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 10, 2025No. 1:24-cv-04391Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION SUMIT BANA and JYOTI SIROHI, Plaintiffs, v. U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION Case No. 24 CV 4391 SERVICES; UR M. JADDOU, in her official capacity as Director of U.S. Citizenship Hon. Georgia N. Alexakis and Immigration Services; and ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Secretary of U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs Sumit Bana and Jyoti Sirohi are citizens of India who applied to become lawful permanent residents of the United States. U.S.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Apex Digital, Inc. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  4. Kingdomware Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Patel v. GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 2022

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API