Legal Opinion

State v. Daugherty

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1894PublishedCited by 2 opinions

cited Code, c. 135; 5 W. Va. 510; 22 W. Va. 771; 2 Graft. 568; 1 Dish. Crim. L. § 1041-1044; Am. Crim. L. § 573-501; 2 Wliar. Ev. § 1226, 1323; Cool. Con. L. 296-298; 5 Am. Rep. 511 ; 6 Am. St. Rep. 757; 21 Am. St. Rep. 266; Id. 790; 3 Am.. St. Rep. 213; 1 Dish. Crim. L. § 1012-1047. cited Art. VIII, s. 3, Const.; section 1, c. 135, sub-section 10, Code; section 16, c. 152, Code; An.d.

Read the full summary

cited Code, c. 135; 5 W. Va. 510; 22 W. Va. 771; 2 Graft. 568; 1 Dish. Crim. L. § 1041-1044; Am. Crim. L. § 573-501; 2 Wliar. Ev. § 1226, 1323; Cool. Con. L. 296-298; 5 Am. Rep. 511 ; 6 Am. St. Rep. 757; 21 Am. St. Rep. 266; Id. 790; 3 Am.. St. Rep. 213; 1 Dish. Crim. L. § 1012-1047. cited Art. VIII, s. 3, Const.; section 1, c. 135, sub-section 10, Code; section 16, c. 152, Code; An.d. Law Diet. 256; 25 Graft. 853; 69 N. Y. 109; section 7, c. 159, Code; 5 W. Ya. 510; 22 W. Ya. 771; 31 W. Ya. 390, 398; Code, c. 152, s. 15.

1Opinion of the Court

ENGLISH, Judge:

On the-third Tuesday in September, 1893, an indictment was found against Charles H. Daugherty by a grand jury empanelled in the Circuit Court of Hampshire county, charging him with the larceny of a certain check therein described, to which indictment the said Daugherty demurred and also pleaded “Not guilty.” The case was continued until the February term, 1891, when it was submitted to a jury; and after the evidence on behalf of the state had been concluded, and the state rested, the prisoner moved the court to exclude the evidence offered by the state, upon the ground that it…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. Bluefield Drug Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Johnson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1873

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API