Edmondson v. Motorists Mutual Insurance
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
This controversy involves the demand of appellants for payment of a. first party supplementary accidental death benefit. The legal issue upon which; .this dispute hinges relates to interpretation of the Insuring Agreement I provision of’the insurance contract issued by appellee, captioned “Supplementary Payment — (Coverage C).” That provision declares that the company will pay $1,000 upon the death of the “named insured”; such “named insured” is defined in this provision as “a first named insured if an individual.” This latter phrase (“first named insured”) is defined in the Insuring…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Ambrose v. State Farm Fire & CasualtyOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
- Weldon v. Commercial Union Assurance Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
- Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. WrightOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
- Gies v. City of GeringNebraska Court of Appeals · 2005
- Westfield Insurance v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.