Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Cirignano

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided April 25, 2007No. 01354Published

1Opinion of the Court

Fabricant, Judith, J.

INTRODUCTION

The defendant, having been sentenced to nine to ten years in state prison, moves to correct the mittimus to provide for additional credit for pre-trial detention. The Commonwealth opposes his motion in part, but agrees that he is entitled to an increase in credit to reflect certain credited awarded him by the Quincy District Court on a separate sentence, but not actually applied to that sentence. After hearing, and review of all materials submitted and authorities cited, the Court concludes that the Commonwealth’s position is correct.

*17BACKGROUND

The following…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CarterMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  2. Commonwealth v. MurphyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  3. Commonwealth v. HarveyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API