Legal Opinion

Smith v. Brown

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 16, 1904Published

Appeal from Louisa District Court. — Hon. James D. Smyti-i, Judge. Suit in equity to. enjoin an alleged liquor nuisance. The trial court dismissed plaintiff’s petition, and he appeals.—

1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, C. J.

The case is in equity, and is triable here de novo. In order that there may be such a trial, the evidence in the lower court must have been preserved, properly certified, and filed within six months of the rendition of the decree. Attached to some shorthand notes we find a certificate of the trial judge that they are the shorthand notes of all the evidence in the trial of the cause wherein D. M. Smith was plaintiff and W. T. Brown and Nellie C. Sprague et al. were defendants. The shorthand reporter who took them retired from office, and thereafter he made a translation thereof, and under oath…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Joy v. BitzerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
  2. Gardner v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  3. Teague v. FortschSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  4. Blanchard v. DevoeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  5. Lewis v. MinthornSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API