Legal Opinion

V.M. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 3, 1999No. 98-1996PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

In the instant case, appellant argues that the trial court erred in denying her motion for judgment of acquittal and her conviction for aggravated battery should be reduced to simple battery because the doctrine of transferred intent does not apply to allow an intended simple battery to form the foundation for a conviction for aggravated battery on a pregnant woman. Although we agree with appellant’s contention that transferred intent is inapplicable here, we affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence.

The charge of aggravated battery on a pregnant woman against V.M. stemmed from an incident…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mordica v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  2. Anderson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  3. Hardwick v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  4. D.J. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  5. State v. JenkinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sagner v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  2. Crittenden v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  3. Firth v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  4. Strattan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  5. VM v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API