Legal Opinion

Matter of McIntyre

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 21, 1998PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*326 OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

We granted allocatur to determine whether the trial court abused its discretion by denying Appellant’s petition to change name. For the following reasons, we reverse.

Appellant, a fifty-three year old male, is a pre-operative transsexual who is undergoing hormonal therapy and psychotherapy in anticipation of sex-reassignment surgery. He has been struggling -with personal gender identity issues since the age of ten. Appellant is the father of two adult sons and has been divorced since 1983.

In 1991, Appellant began dressing as a woman and held himself out to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Falcucci Name CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Commonwealth v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. In Re HarrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In re ReynoldsSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2013
  2. In re BicknellOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. In re BicknellOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. In re Carol A. BoardmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  5. In Re RavitchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API