Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Daniels

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 26, 1984No. 43126PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SATZ, Judge.

Wilbert Daniels, the husband, appeals from a decree of dissolution. Charlie Daniels, the wife, filed no brief. The husband’s counsel on appeal was not his trial counsel. He must take the record as he finds it and so must we.

Previously, we raised the issue of our jurisdiction sua sponte and dismissed the husband’s appeal on the ground it was not timely filed. We then granted the husband’s motion for rehearing. After rehearing, we now find his appeal was timely filed and address the appeal on the merits. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part, with directions.

PROCEDURAL…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Conrad v. BowersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Ravenscroft v. RavenscroftMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Fields v. FieldsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Seelig v. SeeligMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Hull v. HullMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Moyer v. WalkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Ritter Landscaping, Inc. v. MeeksMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Tice v. TiceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Barron v. BarronMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Cone v. KenneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API