Legal Opinion

Yorkshire Towers Co. v. Harpster

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided December 31, 1986PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Roger B. Hunting, J.

These three motions and cross motions for summary judgment or dismissal in each case are consolidated for disposition, since they present the identical legal issue for the court’s consideration:

*385Are individuals of the same sex in long-standing, quasi-marital relationships roommates or immediate family members for the purposes of a rent-stabilized lease renewal? On the facts presented, this court finds each respondent to be the equivalent of a surviving spouse, who outlived their marriage partner. The respondents are, therefore, deemed de facto immediate…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Concourse Village, Inc. v. BilottiCivil Court of the City of New York · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Braschi v. Stahl Associates Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Rent Stabilization Ass'n of New York, Inc. v. HigginsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Koppelman v. O'KeeffeAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1988
  4. Rosenberg Diamond Development Corp. v. LewisCivil Court of the City of New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API