Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Rose v. Stephens Inst.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 24, 2018No. 17-15111PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion filed on August 24, 2018, and published at 901 F.3d 1124, is amended by the opinion filed concurrently with this order, as follows:
On slip opinion page 10, begin the first full paragraph with: "As relevant here, the falsity requirement can be satisfied in one of two ways."
With this amendment, Judges Graber and Zipps have voted to deny Appellant's petition for panel rehearing, and Judge Smith has voted to grant it. Judge Graber has voted to deny Appellant's petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Zipps has so recommended. Judge Smith has recommended granting the petition for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Universal Health Services, Inc. v. United States ex rel. EscobarSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- William Earl Warren III v. City of Carlsbad Brian Watson James Thompson Frank Mannen Raymond Patchett Stewart Gary Ann JansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Ebeid Ex Rel. United States v. LungwitzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Richard Vos v. City of Newport BeachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- US Ex Rel. Geraldine Godecke v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- United States ex rel Lemon v. Nurses To Go, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- Victoria Druding v. Care AlternativesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2023
- United States v. Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2019
- United States ex rel. Mei Ling v. City of L. A.District Court, C.D. California · 2019
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.