Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Tyson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 17, 2009No. COA07-1376Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

HUNTER, Robert C., Judge,

concurring in part, dissenting in part.

I concur in Part III of the majority opinion holding that the trial court committed plain error in instructing the jury, warranting a new trial. However, because I conclude that the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion' to dismiss the statutory rape charges for insufficient evidence of defendant’s consciousness, I respectfully dissent in Part II of the majority opinion.

My concern with the majority’s holding in Part II is that it sets a precedent which allows a defendant to be convicted of a crime even though the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. JerrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. CaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. BagleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  4. State v. KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  5. State v. CummingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API