Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Sprague

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1888PublishedCited by 25 opinions

.Error to Wayne. (Gartner, J.) Debt for rent on sealed lease. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This is an action of debt, brought to recover damages claimed by reason of the failure of defendants to pay rent of certain premises described in a written lease signed by the parties. The action was commenced on March 31, 1886.- The facts in the case are practically agreed on, and the questions involved raise an issue of law.

In the spring of 1877 the two defendants were partners, doing business under the name of Gillis& Sprague, and leased a store building from plaintiff for the three years ensuing April 1, 1877, upon a specified rental, pay*52able monthly. The last monthly installment of rent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hoyt Post v. CampauMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Christy v. FarlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Goodrich v. LelandMichigan Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. In re Locust Bldg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
  2. Higgins v. StreetSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  3. Wheatland Grain & Lumber Co. v. DowdenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Fellows v. National Can Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
  5. Rondot v. Rogers Tp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API