Legal Opinion

Seneca Nation of Indians v. Brucker

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 25, 1958No. 14488PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant Seneca Nation of Indians seeks an injunction to restrain the appellees from constructing an Allegheny Reservoir Project so as to flood a substantial amount of appellant’s lands. The District Court dismissed the complaint.

It is undisputed (1) that the proposed flooding will infringe Indian rights acquired by treaty in 1794, 7 Stat. 44, and (2) that Congress can authorize a taking by eminent domain despite the treaty. Cherokee Nation v. Southern Kansas Railway Company, 1890, 135 U.S. 641, 654-657, 10 S.Ct. 965, 34 L.Ed. 295. The question here is whether Congress has, in a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cherokee Nation v. Southern Kansas Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. United States v. 21,250 Acres of LandDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1957

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Seneca Nation of Indians v. BruckerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  2. Seneca Nation of Indians v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  3. State v. MosesWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  4. State v. MosesWashington Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API