Legal Opinion

Hayling v. Hayling

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 20, 1984PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The order of the Chancery Division dated March 8, 1983, that denied the application of defendant Raymond Hayling for “a rehearing, a revision and reduction of that portion of the Amended Judgment of Divorce that relates to equitable distribution, alimony and child support” and granted the motion of plaintiff Yvette Hayling to enforce her rights as a litigant is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Toy in his oral opinion of February 18, 1983. We are satisfied from our study of the record that defendant has failed to establish any grounds or reasons justifying the granting…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Baumann v. MarinaroSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. Carton v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
  3. Palko v. PalkoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  4. State v. LeFanteSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  5. Weisberg v. KoprowskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. EKATERINA TOSTOGUZOVA VS. ARTEM ANTOSHKIN (FM-09-2225-17, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020
  2. MARTA LUKACS VS. HIGHSTOWN MEDICAL ASSOCIATES (L-8095-13, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2021
  3. MARTA LUKACS VS. HIGHSTOWN MEDICAL ASSOCIATES (L-8095-13, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2021
  4. SHAWNA MORGAN VS. WILLIE MAXWELL II (L-5834-17, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API