Legal Opinion

M. v. W.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 24, 1897Published

Appeal from Sixth district court. Action by M. and others against W. From a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtDaly, P. J.

The plaintiffs have recovered a judgment against the defendant for goods sold to Ms wife between February 18 and May 28, 1897, amounting to $176.57. The goods consisted of wearing apparel and toilet articles, and $171.83 of the amount was purchased in the period from May 17th to 28th inclusive. The defendant had separated from his wife on May 1st, and he claimed that at that time she was amply provided with wearing apparel and had over $1,000 in two banks, and that the goods were furnished upon the credit of Ms wife. On the part of the plaintiffs it was contended that the goods were sold upon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mabbett v. . WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
  2. Atkins v. . ElwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Taggart v. FoxNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1882
  4. Hartjen v. RuebsamenAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API