Claim of McDowell v. La Voy
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Mahoney, P. J. (dissenting.)
I dissent and vote to affirm the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board that determined that claimant’s malpractice action against her former attorney was not a third-party action within the meaning of section 29 of the Workers’ Compensation Law.
Notwithstanding the majority’s statement to the contrary, I am not aware of any "recent developments in the law” that have eroded the cogent reasoning set forth in this court’s opinion in Matter of Cresci v Krasilousky Trucking Co. (5 AD2d 569, mot for lv to app den 4 NY2d 677) to the effect that legal malpractice is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matter of Parchefsky v. Kroll Bros., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Claim of Petterson v. Daystrom Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Claim of Meachem v. New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
- MATTER OF RYAN v. Gen. Elec. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1970
- Claim of Cresci v. Mike Krasilousky Trucking Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.