Legal Opinion · Dissent

S & M Finance Co. Fort Dodge v. Iowa State Tax Commission

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 12, 1968No. 52975Published

1DissentSnell, Justice

I dissent as I cannot agree with the conclusion reached in Division III of the majority opinion.

A discussion of what was told plaintiff and plaintiff’s reliance thereon is in my opinion completely irrelevant and not an issue before us. With commendable frankness the commission says in its reply brief, (I quote):

“The fact is that appellee was advised in 1945 by tax commission personnel that it did not have to collect sales tax on sales of repossessed merchandise and, as a consequence, appellee surrendered its retail sales tax permit.”

That the commission was fully advised appears without…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. La Societe Francaise De Bienfaisance Mutuelle v. California EmploymentCommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  2. City of Ames v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Heberton EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  5. Market Street Railway Co. v. Calalifornia State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API