Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Levee v. Carruth

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 30, 1933No. 1234PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELLIOTT, Judge.

On petition of the state, on the relation oí Lucius P. Levee, a rule was issued in this case to the judge of the Eighteenth judicial district court, in and for the parish of Pointe Coupee, ordering him to show cause why writs of mandamus, prohibition, and cer-tiorari should not issue to him as prayed for.

The relator avers, and the record shows, that he is the defendant in a suit in which Putnam & Norman, Inc., claim of him $641.22 on an account.

The demand of the plaintiff was put at issue; the defendant Levee praying for trial by jury. The court granted his prayer and fixed the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Burnett v. JohnstonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Putnam & Norman, Inc. v. LeveeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. Putnam & Norman, Inc. v. LeveeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API