Legal Opinion

Murray v. Meade

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1893No. 754PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Kittitas Coimty.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Stiles, J.

One Louden having commenced an action in the superior court of Kittitas county against Randall and Carruthers, partners, caused an attachment to be issued and levied upon certain personal property. Thereafter the plaintiff in this action, with another, executed and delivered to the sheriff a forthcoming bond, and the property was returned to the judgment debtors.

After obtaining his judgment Louden issued an execution which was delivered to the sheriff, who was defendant in this action, and the sheriff levied upon property of the judgment…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Howerton v. . SpragueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
  2. State ex rel. Share v. BoydIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Olson v. Snake River Valley RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Yamamoto v. Puget Sound Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Bartelt v. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Cathcart v. BryantWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Cremidas v. DallasWashington Supreme Court · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API