Legal Opinion

Katz v. State Tax Commission

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 25, 1985PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Yesawich, Jr., J.

Prior to January of 1972, William Katz, a New York resident, and Hyman Gilinsky were partners. The sole asset of their partnership was a parcel of real property located in the City of *1030Binghamton and leased to an automobile dealership. Katz’s spouse, in partnership with Yetta and Stanley Gilinsky, owned a separate parcel of property, also located in Binghamton and leased to another automobile dealership. Late in 1971, the Katzs, petitioners herein, sold their respective interests in the properties to the remaining partners, in exchange for which petitioners received payment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Delmhorst v. State Tax CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Epstein v. State Tax CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. Delmhorst v. State Tax CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Taylor v. State Tax CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pastor v. State Tax CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Matter of Murphy v. New York State Tax Appeals Trib.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API