Legal Opinion

Bankston v. Cuyahoga Cty. Prosecutor's Office

Ohio Court of Claims

Decided April 8, 2026No. 2025-00983PQPublished

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Bankston v. Cuyahoga Cty. Prosecutor's Office,

2026-Ohio-1718.] IN THE COURT OF CLAIMS OF OHIO ANGELIQUE BANKSTON Case No. 2025-00983PQ Requester Judge Lisa L. Sadler v. DECISION AND ENTRY CUYAHOGA COUNTY PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE Respondent {¶1} Requester, a self-represented litigant, has filed written objections to a special master’s report and recommendation in this public-records case. Respondent has not filed objections to the report and recommendation. {¶2} Because requester failed to serve her written objections in the mandatory manner required by R.C. 2743.75(F)(2), requester’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mohasco Corp. v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Welsh-Huggins v. Jefferson Cty. Prosecutor's Office (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  3. State ex rel. Neil v. French (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State ex rel. Claypool v. Geauga Cty.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025
  5. White v. Ross Corr. Inst.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API