Legal Opinion

Smith v. Lassen

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 7, 1967No. 2 CA-CIV 230PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MOLLOY, Judge.

The appellee, Obed M. Lassen, State Land Commissioner, in a motion for rehearing, has called our attention to A.R.S. § 37-281, subsec. C, adopted by Chapter 89, Laws of 1941, which the Commissioner contends changes the rule of State ex rel. Mullen v. Hedrick, 51 Ariz. 180, 75 P.2d 366 (1938), which decision was cited in the opinion heretofore released in this action.

The Commissioner contends that the 1941 amendment was specifically adopted by the legislature to change the rule of Mullen v. Hedrick, and of this we have no knowledge. The wording of the 1941 amendment, however,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Arizona Corp. Commission v. Fred Harvey Transportation Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Schell v. WhiteArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  3. State Ex Rel. Mullen v. HedrickArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Smith v. LassenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lines v. City of MilwaukieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API