Legal Opinion

Johnson v. County of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 21, 1939No. Civ. 11010PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

The plaintiff sued to recover four separate items of taxes alleged to have been illegally collected. The defendant filed a general demurrer, it was overruled, and from the judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff the defendant has appealed. A statement of the facts, the defendant says, is as follows.

Plaintiff at all times herein concerned was the owner of, and did business under the name, Victor Johnson & Company, as a wholesale dealer in twine, rope and cordage. He had the exclusive agency in the United States for the product of, and was under agreement to buy exclusively from,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  2. Walker v. HoustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. State v. White Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  4. Dame v. C. H. Hanson & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  5. County of San Diego v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. County of Sacramento v. Assessment Appeals Board No. 2California Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. Export Leaf Tobacco Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API