Ruvalcaba v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Maupin, J.:
In this opinion, we hold that a sentencing judge does not necessarily violate Martinez v. State1 by considering a criminal defendant’s status as an illegal alien when determining whether to grant or deny a request for probation.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On June 9, 2004, as part of a plea negotiation with the State, appellant Salvador Ruvalcaba entered a guilty plea to one count of sale of a controlled substance arising from a seizure of contraband in February of that year. Ruvalcaba is a Mexican national who was in the United States illegally when he committed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Mauricio Borrero-IsazaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Randell v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1993
- Martinez v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. SanchezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. CesarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Ochoa v. BassCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008
- Feazeal (Travis) Vs. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2019
- NEWMAN (LINDSIE) VS. STATE C/W 67756Nevada Supreme Court · 2016
- NEWMAN (LINDSIE) VS. STATE C/W 67756Nevada Supreme Court · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.