Legal Opinion

Ruvalcaba v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 2006No. 44106PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Maupin, J.:

In this opinion, we hold that a sentencing judge does not necessarily violate Martinez v. State1 by considering a criminal defendant’s status as an illegal alien when determining whether to grant or deny a request for probation.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On June 9, 2004, as part of a plea negotiation with the State, appellant Salvador Ruvalcaba entered a guilty plea to one count of sale of a controlled substance arising from a seizure of contraband in February of that year. Ruvalcaba is a Mexican national who was in the United States illegally when he committed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. Mauricio Borrero-IsazaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. Randell v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Martinez v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  5. People v. SanchezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. CesarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  2. Ochoa v. BassCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008
  3. Feazeal (Travis) Vs. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2019
  4. NEWMAN (LINDSIE) VS. STATE C/W 67756Nevada Supreme Court · 2016
  5. NEWMAN (LINDSIE) VS. STATE C/W 67756Nevada Supreme Court · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API