Legal Opinion

Burnett v. Strong

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1853PublishedCited by 6 opinions

On appeal from the probate court of Monroe county; Hon. W. A. Tucker, probate judge of Monroe county. A sufficient statement of the facts of this case will be found in the opinion of the court. The statute (Hutch. Code, 660, § 75) requires of every executor, administrator, &oc., to file a complete and perfect inventory of all the personal assets of his decedent.

Read the full summary

On appeal from the probate court of Monroe county; Hon. W. A. Tucker, probate judge of Monroe county. A sufficient statement of the facts of this case will be found in the opinion of the court. The statute (Hutch. Code, 660, § 75) requires of every executor, administrator, &oc., to file a complete and perfect inventory of all the personal assets of his decedent. Without a faithful discharge of this important duty, it is impossible for him to perform his subsequent duties, and a neglect to do so, is a direct fraud on the rights of the heirs, creditors, and distributees. The statute (Hutch.…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Handy

This was a bill filed in the probate court of Monroe county, ■ by the widow and heirs of Daniel Burnett, deceased, against the appellees, as executors of Daniel Burnett, alleging that the executors have failed to return in their inventory two hundred and twelve shares of bank stock, and some thirty negroes, with their increase, and have not accounted for the annual proceeds of a plantation on which these negroes were employed, which plantation, negroes, and proceeds, belong to the estate of the testator. The bill prays for an account of this property, and *121that the executors make their final…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Finlay v. King's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1830

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lindsey v. LindseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Markham v. HuffordMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  3. McWillie v. Van VacterMississippi Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Alexander v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  5. Edwards v. MurrayWyoming Supreme Court · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API