Chastain v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Birdsong, Judge.
This is an interlocutory appeal in a case involving possession of marijuana. The sole enumeration of error is “the trial court erred upon motion of the state several days after a final order, in vacating said order granting the defendant’s motions to suppress after a full, complete hearing, letting the state introduce more evidence at another hearing, ultimately resulting in a new order denying the motions to suppress.”
Although the issue of reconsideration of a suppression order has not been resolved by statute (Code Ann. § 27-313), nor does it appear to have been presented…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- DiBella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Cogen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Pickens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- State v. BrodieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Young v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
- Martin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- State v. MarcusCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.