Legal Opinion

Santana Portillo-Flores v. Robert Wilkinson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 25, 2021No. 17-71406Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JAN 25 2021 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SANTANA PORTILLO-FLORES; No. 17-71406 DAYRON CAMILO FLORES- PORTILLO, Agency Nos. A208-687-624 A208-687-625 Petitioners, v. MEMORANDUM* ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Acting Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Argued and Submitted November 17, 2020 San Francisco, California Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and SCHROEDER and BERZON, Circuit Judges. Concurrence by Judge BERZON Santana Portillo-Flores (Portillo)…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Miguel Tejeda-Mata v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  3. Cecilia Aguilar Fermin v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  4. United States v. David R. HawkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. BARCENASBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API