In Re the Marriage of Ikeler
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Concurrence
Justice EID,
specially concurring.
Under the rationale adopted by the majority today, a district court can conduct an unconscionability review of all provisions of a marital agreement. Yet the legislature has permitted such review “insofar, but only insofar, as the provisions of such agreement ... relate to” the determination of spousal maintenance. § 14-2-307(2), C.R.S. (2006) (emphasis added). In my view, the attorney’s fees waiver provision at issue in this case can be reviewed for unconscionability not because all provisions in a marital agreement can be subjected to such review, as the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Barnett Bank of Marion County, N. A. v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Turbyne v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- City & County of Denver v. District Court Ex Rel. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.