STATE of Louisiana v. I.C.S.; State of Louisiana v. C.M.S.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1DissentWeimer, J.
hThe fundamental question posed is whether one should face adult consequences for offenses committed as a juvenile. An analysis of all relevant statutory provisions, as opposed to singling out one provision, demonstrates the legislature’s intent not to impose adult consequences for certain acts when committed as a juvenile. For the reasons discussed below, I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion.
The legislature’s intent was aptly identified by Judge Caraway, who dissented from the court of appeal’s ruling that a person who, as a juvenile, committed indecent acts with another juvenile…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Theriot v. Midland Risk Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.