Legal Opinion · Dissent

STATE of Louisiana v. I.C.S.; State of Louisiana v. C.M.S.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 1, 2014No. 2013-CK-1023Published

1DissentWeimer, J.

hThe fundamental question posed is whether one should face adult consequences for offenses committed as a juvenile. An analysis of all relevant statutory provisions, as opposed to singling out one provision, demonstrates the legislature’s intent not to impose adult consequences for certain acts when committed as a juvenile. For the reasons discussed below, I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion.

The legislature’s intent was aptly identified by Judge Caraway, who dissented from the court of appeal’s ruling that a person who, as a juvenile, committed indecent acts with another juvenile…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Theriot v. Midland Risk Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API