Legal Opinion
Mahoney v. Bostel
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 24, 2010No. 08-3312PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Anthony Mahoney appeals from the District Court’s denial of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus he filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. For the following reasons we will affirm.
I
In 1998 Clark and Barbara Ferry hired Mahoney to represent them with respect to an automobile accident in which their son had been killed.1 In January 1999 the offending driver’s insurance carrier advised the Ferrys that the case had been settled for $75,000 and that they had mailed to Mahoney a check in that amount, made out to “Clark Ferry & Barbara Ferry ... and Mahoney & Mahoney.” When the…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Rhines v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- United States v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Lambert v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Kenneth Lee v. William Stickman Stephen Zappala, Jr. Michael FisherCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by13 opinions
- CODY v. SWEENEYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
- GREEN v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
- GREGORIO v. DAVISDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
- HAMILTON v. NOGANDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
- KILLION v. ROYCEDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.