United States v. Frazier
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
Darden, Judge:
Convicted of several offenses on his plea of guilty, the accused petitioned for review of whether his conviction of forgery under Charge II, specification 1, is valid in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in O’Callahan v Parker, 395 US 258, 23 L Ed 2d 291, 89 S Ct 1683 (1969). Because nothing in that opinion suggests that service-connection cannot be judged on the basis of whether the acts constituting the offense also establish service-connection, we look to the pertinent facts. Cf. United States v Morisseau, 19 USCMA 17, 41 CMR 17.
The offense in question…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- O'Callahan v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. CamachoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- United States v. RegoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- United States v. MorisseauUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- United States v. PeakUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. SimsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
- United States v. UhlmanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- Gregory Cole v. Melvin Laird, as Secretary of Defense, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. StewartU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1975
- United States v. PetersonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.