Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Delano v. Tuthill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1919Published

1Opinion of the Court

We cannot conclude positively that the answering affidavits did not raise an issue of a contract, not express but implied, to accept the reduced rate of payment for this advertising. Under the general rule declared in People ex rel. McMackin v. Board of Police (107 N. Y. 240), followed in People ex rel. Van Deren v. Moore (78 App. Div. 28), as to the construction of pleadings, we reverse the order, without costs, and deny the motion for a peremptory writ, without costs. The relator may have an order for an alternative writ, without costs, if he be so advised. We express no *946opinion upon the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. McMackin v. . Bd. of PoliceNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Van Deren v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API