Legal Opinion

Narragansett Racing Association v. Mazzaro

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided May 18, 1976No. 74-255-AppealPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This case is controlled by G. L. 1956 (1969 Reenactment) §41-3-17 as enacted by P. L. 1960, ch. 148, §1. As construed in Burrillville Racing Ass’n v. Garabedian, 113 R. I. 134, 138, 318 A.2d 469, 472 (1974), that enactment accomplished two purposes: (1) it abrogated the common law rule permitting a racetrack operator to exclude or eject any person from its premises without having to show cause therefor, and (2) it established as preconditions to such an exclusion or ejectment a determination by the racetrack operator that such a person is undesirable and that his presence is inconsistent with…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Burrillville Racing Association v. GarabedianSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974
  2. Burrillville Racing Association v. MelloSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Staino v. PA. ST. HORSE RACING COMM.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Ziskis v. KowalskiDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1989
  3. Armstrong v. PolaskiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API