Legal Opinion
Real Estate Bank & Trust Co. v. Baldwin Locomotive Works
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided September 14, 1916PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Trover. Before Judge Charlton. Chatham superior court. August 11, 1915.
1Opinion of the Court
Per. Curiam.
1. If the instrument under which the plaintiff claimed title to the engine involved in the controversy be treated as one for the lease of railroad equipment, with the right of purchase, under the Civil Code (1910), §§ 2791, 2792, it did not appear that the railroad on which the engine was used or to be used was operated by the lessee, O. T. Bourne & Go. (under which name O. T. Bourne did business).(a) An instrument falling within the provisions of the code sections above cited should be recorded in the county where is situated the principal office of the railroad company in this…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Vizard v. MoodySupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Penton v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
3Cited by6 opinions
- Thomas v. HudsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Passieu v. B. F. Goodrich Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
- Hall v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
- Savnnah Bank & Trust Company v. Great American Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1962
- Peoples Credit Clothing Co. v. Scottish Union & National InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.