Legal Opinion

United States v. Davis

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided October 12, 1988No. CR-2-86-063PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

KINNEARY, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court to consider the various motions of the defendant, S. Robert Davis, and the government’s responses thereto.

On October 6, 1986, a jury convicted S. Robert Davis for mail fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (1982), in connection with an alleged scheme with the city manager of Upper Arlington, Harold Hyrne, to inflate the cost of a waterline installed in the Squirrel Bend subdivision. According to the Indictment, Hyrne then passed on the inflated charges to property owners who wished to “tap-in” to the waterline.

The first indictment…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Nelson ItalianoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  2. State v. WrightWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. WrightWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  5. State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API