Morrow v. Tunkhannock Ice Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 271, Jan. T., 1904, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Monroe Co., Feb. T., 1901, No. 23, on verdict for defendant in case of Cyrus C. Morrow v. The Tunkhannock Ice Company. Assumpsit upon a written contract. Before Ferris, P. J. The court charged in part as follows : The action is grounded upon a written contract bearing date of October 24, 1899, between C. C. Morrow, this plaintiff, and the Tunkhannock Ice Company, this defendant.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 271, Jan. T., 1904, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Monroe Co., Feb. T., 1901, No. 23, on verdict for defendant in case of Cyrus C. Morrow v. The Tunkhannock Ice Company. Assumpsit upon a written contract. Before Ferris, P. J. The court charged in part as follows : The action is grounded upon a written contract bearing date of October 24, 1899, between C. C. Morrow, this plaintiff, and the Tunkhannock Ice Company, this defendant. By that contract the plaintiff agrees to accept the position' of general sales agent of the Tunkhannock Ice Company for the term of five years from…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mb. Justice Potteb,
On October 24, 1899, Cyrus C. Marrow entered into a written agreement with the Tunkhannock lee Company by which he agreed to accept the' position of general sales agent for the company for a term of five years from January 1,1900, “ and as such to devote his time and ability to the best interest and welfare of the said company; ... to solicit trade, negotiate and make sales of the entire capacity of the said company, attend to the collection of the accounts .... adjust all freight rates and in general arrange for the sale and delivery of the ice product of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Allen v. Colliery Engineers' Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
3Cited by2 opinions
- Genack v. GormanMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Sondberg v. Eisenberg, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1930