Legal Opinion
State v. Webster
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided September 19, 1991No. 2 CA-CR 91-0080PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Judge.
Following a jury trial, appellant was convicted of unlawful possession of a narcotic drug for sale, a class 2 felony. He admitted two prior convictions and was sentenced to a presumptive term of 15.75 years’ imprisonment.
On appeal, appellant raises two issues: 1) the trial court erred in refusing to suppress the contraband as the product of an illegal detention, and 2) there was insufficient evidence to support a conviction for possession for sale.
We review the facts presented at the suppression hearing in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s ruling.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. NashArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. BlevinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GonsalvesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- People v. GonzalezIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. PenaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- United States v. Jamal Williams, AKA Jamal AbdullahCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Wilson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.