Legal Opinion

Cummings v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 19, 1986No. BG-358PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

489 So.2d 121 (1986)

Edward CUMMINGS, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. BG-358.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 19, 1986.

Gilbert A. Schaffnit, Gainesville, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Gary L. Printy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

ZEHMER, Judge.

Appellant, Edward Cummings, negotiated a plea to grand theft and was sentenced beyond the recommended range under the sentencing guidelines. He contends that the reasons for departure are insufficient. Once again we are required to reverse and remand for resentencing.

The following written reasons…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Weems v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Patty v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Felts v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  2. Berry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  3. Dallas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  4. Bailey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  5. Padgett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API