Legal Opinion
Austin v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided February 22, 2021No. 1:19-cv-01146Unknown
1Opinion
YA \ FEB 22 2021 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Yee toswengutd oh WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SSTERW DISTRICT oF DONALD A., 1:19-CV-01146-MJR DECISION AND ORDER Plaintiff, -\V- ANDREW SAUL Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(c), the parties consented to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case. (Dkt. No. 21). Plaintiff Donald A." (‘plaintiff’) brings this action pursuant to
42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3) seeking judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner’” or “defendant”)…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Rita Schaal v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Dockets 96-6212, 96-6316Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Burgess v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Darline Halloran v. Jo Anne Barnhart, as Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Ronald E. Veino, Sr. v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.